Facts of Indo-sino war- I have made an attempt to put down the Truth of the Indian History, regarding Indo Sino war. The study is regarding the Indo-sino war. The war history, philosophy of both the countries, reasons responsible for the war, is elaborated. The impact is laid to have the Truth of the Occasion and its result. The focus is also given on the role of the contemporary governance. The role of Indian Governance responsible for land cessation of 38000 Sq.mtrs, to China is laid.
The Chinese governance spanning the Area of Tibet and its forceful annexation is discussed. The truth which negates any Claim of China, along with the Present Territorial Facts are detailed. The Aticle also states the forceful subjugation of the Indian Land, in the name of Aksai-chin.
The absence of true leadership of Indian Governance resulting severe loss is articulated. The weakness in tactical policies, diplomatic failures and dithered willingness of governance are put forward. The mystery of lending of 38000 Sq.km areas is mentioned in light of facts of Indo-Sino war.
We suggest you to purchase the Ayurveda commodities from the links provided under our SERVICE TAB. We have provided many options for online purchase. Like that of Ayurveda herbs/medicines, Yoga Mats, a defined pattern of cotton clothes, books or literature etc. from the selected Authentic Online Shopping Sites. They are exclusively selected for you. The reason of their selection is our faith on their utilised Products.
Our Team members have used them for Practical experience. Therefore we have a faith on them and hence we recommend them. Moreover we don’t want you to compromise with your health issues. Let the world realise the Power of Indian Ayurveda, Yoga and Indian tradition. A step towards, Self- dependence.
The History of the Chinese reveals that they were the Traders and opportunists by nature. The various Chinese, who visited India, were astounded to see the beauty of the India and Indian Physique. The Indian prosperity lured them. Only China was the country whose GDP hovered around Indian GDP.
The Chinese GDP was eventually left far behind, till the period when India lost its Independence. The GDP of India was 24.5% .( approx) before the Britishers subjugated India. After independence, the Indian GDP was about 3.6%. The Chinese leader always considered India as their Competitor but not as their friendly neighbor. But the Indians always believed Chinese as a good neighbor with a brotherhood.
Zhou Enlai, quoted map of 1929 of
Following evidences negate the Chinese Claim- in Light of facts of Indo-Sino War.
The region of North- East Indian states has its borrowings from the Ancient history. it relates to Parushuram, almost more than 9500 years, old. The Chinese Traveler, Xuanzang, in 7th century, mentions the Place in the name of Kamrupa. He also mentions the existence of Siachin. However,He never mentions any North east frontier of Himalayas to be the Part of China.
Alexander Mackenzie, probably the first person to designate the Land as North- East Frontier. He submitted Memorandum to the Government on the North-East Frontier of Bengal in 1869 . His book, ‘ History of the Relations of the Government with the Hill Tribes on the North-East Frontier of Bengal’, was published by the Bengal Government in 1884. Some writers also called it the ‘Eastern Frontier’.
Sir Henry McMahon, secretary in the Indian foreign department and representative of Great Britain held a conference. This was held in 1912–13 in Simla (now called Shimla, in the state of Himachal Pradesh). He called China and Tibet to settle frontier issues. And other matters relating to Tibet, also.
To the British, the line marked the geographic, ethnic, and administrative boundary between the two regions. These were namely British India and China. This line hence is referred as Macmohan line.
The delegates from Great Britain, China, and Tibet agreed on the frontier Line.
The Tibetan Empire emerged in the 7th century. However, with the fall of the empire the region soon divided into a variety of territories. The bulk of western and central Tibet (Ü-Tsang) was often nominally unified. This was under a series of Tibetan governments in Lhasa, Shigatse, or nearby locations.
The eastern regions of Kham and Amdo often maintained a more decentralized indigenous political structure. This being divided among a number of small principalities and tribal groups. These were besieged by the Chinese rule after the Battle of Chamdo. Most of this area was eventually incorporated into the Chinese provinces of Sichuan and Qinghai. However, the current borders of Tibet were established in the 18th century.
Following the Xinhai Revolution against the Qing dynasty in 1912, Qing soldiers were disarmed. They were escorted out of Tibet Area (Ü-Tsang). The region subsequently declared its independence in 1913. They never asked recognition by the subsequent Chinese Republican government. Later, Lhasa took control of the western part of Xikang, China. This establishes the fact that Tibet was never a Part of China.
In 1914 the Tibetan government signed the Simla Accord with Britain, ceding the South Tibet region to them. The Chinese government denounced the agreement as illegal
The Tibet region maintained its autonomy until 1951. When, following the Battle of Chamdo, was waged by the Chinese. Tibet was occupied and incorporated into the People’s Republic of China. The previous Tibetan government was abolished in 1959 after a failed uprising.
The annexation of Tibet by the People’s Republic of China is called the “Peaceful Liberation of Tibet” by the Chinese government. However the Tibetan Government in Exile maintains it to be the “Chinese invasion of Tibet” .
From a legal standpoint, Tibet has to this day not lost its statehood. It is an independent state under illegal occupation. Neither China’s military invasion nor the continuing occupation has transferred the sovereignty of Tibet. The government of Tibet, in exile, also claims it.
The Indian governance was surprisingly not shaken by the aggression of China. They never foresighted Chinas aggression. They were unable to learn any lesson from the ruthless war waged by the Chinese governance on Tibet.
The china was in relentless aggression. However the contemporary Prime Minister of India was unable to foresee Chinese thirst of aggression. He was also incapable to utilize the opportunity of Chinese war against America and Russia, in concern with Korea.
The PLA Army of China crossed McMahon Line on August 26, 1959. They Captured an Indian outpost at Longju, a short distance south of the line. They however abandoned that outpost in 1961. But no remarkable resort of Diplomatic and tactical development by Indian Governance, are evident.
The India was leaded by a Prime Minister who only knew one Philosophy. His learning were based on Early twentieth-century developments. He believed that great powers that were ostracized became a source of instability. In an era that saw the unveiling of nuclear bombs, the cost of a unsatisfied PRC would be tragic. Hence it was better to resolute with PRC than to be against it. This was probably a driving force due to which Mr. Nehru supported Chinas permanent membership in UN, also.
This asserts the temperament of Mr. Nehru. His self belief and willingness to fight against the Chinese.
In 1950, he had stated in the Indian parliament. “Can anyone deny China at the present moment the right of a Great Power from the point of view of strength and power?. He further stated that she is a Great Power, regardless of whether you like or dislike it.” He underlined that the PRC was a “well-established fact”. And that excluding the PRC from Security Council was an “unrealistic state of affairs.”
During the war – The Prime Minister soon realized the Trauma of the surging PLA troops in India. He was also falsely advocated to avoid the usage of Air force and Navy. The reason was to save the other Parts of India like Calcutta etc. from further massacre.
America and the Britishers nodded for the support. Mr. Zhou Enlai, soon realized the fact and fear. He then acted smartly. Thus seized the war with a promise to maintain the status quo, by moving back to the LAC ( Line of Actual control).
Why Mr. Nehru ceded an Area of about 38000 Sq. Km -in Light of facts of Indo-Sino War? . Just understand following facts.
Chinese military action grew increasingly aggressive. Most importantly when India rejected proposed Chinese diplomatic settlements throughout 1960–1962. Therefore China re-commenced previously-banned “forward patrols” in Ladakh from 30 April 1962.
On 10 July 1962, 350 Chinese troops surrounded an Indian post in Chushul (north of the McMahon Line). They then withdrew after a heated argument via loudspeaker. On 22 July, the Forward Policy was extended to allow Indian troops to push back Chinese troops. The Chinese troops who were already established in disputed territory.
But the Point to be noted is that what was Mr. Nehru and Mr. Paul doing on diplomatic front and Army front ?. They had ample of time before the war actually started. Surprisingly, the plan of Indian Diplomatic and Military reassertions do not even show the glimpses of the Indian Stand?
China finally abandoned all attempts of peaceful resolution on 20 October 1962. The PLA Army thus invading disputed territory along the 3,225 kilometre- (2,000-mile-) long Himalayan border in Ladakh. And across the McMahon Line.
This is preety shocking . The truth is that Mr. Zhou Enlai, himself withdraws the war. He simultaneously announces to reinstate Line of Actual Control. For which good reason can he ask for acquisition of Indian Area of 38000 Sq. Km.?. what was the cause of India’s surrender of Large Area? The question also arises that why did India returned the acquired Area of Pakistan ?.
The significant difference is that neither the Indian Governance nor their Military surrendered in 1962 Indo –sino war. But India Lost a huge Area, why?. However, India could never acquire area when Pakistani Governance and their Military surrendered, why? This asks for explanation.
We have the ability to shake the world. Regaining of Aksai-chin is meagre a matter of maximum of 3 years only.
The world history infers that no governance can change the destiny of the inhabitants. Not possible, unless the inhabitants make a vital promise to themselves to change it. Japan is an example. Japan could only succeed because Japanese, after World War II realized the Path. The Path to grow the shattered economy. The realization of Japanese was by creating an Aura, an environment of growth with an Ideology. The basic ideology was to Use, utilize and purchase which was grown or made in Japan, only. Let us initiate. Just believe in your goods, your market and explore the ideas to export them. But not import. Don’t use any imported items.
I will surely try to update the Art of Self dependence, in my coming blogs. Till then, Stay Healthy, be very positive. This is the time of new morning of a Bright India. It is just to happen.
Thanks.
Vanda Mattra
WE ARE HERE TO SERVE YOU. YOU MAY FIND OUR OTHER SERVICES ON OUR ‘SERVICE TAB’
POST YOUR COMMENTS. WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU. YOU MAY CONNECT US OR CONTACT US. DON’T FORGET TO BUILD RELATION. TRY ONCE WE WILL SURELY RESPOND. FOR SURE RELATION BUILDING IS A KEY TO SUCCESS.
Our Virtual Touring Journey along with you will start via Posted Blogs. Really they are going to reincarnate you, your entire life style. Just be with us.
Best 10 places to visit in NASHIK city has become the Centre of attraction because… Read More
Matheran is part of the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Top places to visit in MATHERAN is one… Read More
Sapno ki Nagri Mumbai is colourful, vibrant and full of life. Nestled by the Arabian… Read More
we are going to witnessing natures best creation in India and you going to be… Read More
Top 10 places to visit in DHARAMKOT visit now – A Heaven for the Peaceful… Read More
Top attractive places to visit in Jhansi The Home of Jhansi Ki Rani :- 1.Jhansi… Read More